Professor Sapolsky Explains the Origin of Religion Part 1/2.
Speculations. Historicity of biblical accounts must be judged not in a
naturalistic/mechanistic point of view but using the laws of evidence.
i love this guy ive watched all his lectures, hes the coolest
“cheap shitty theoretical thinker” just the sort of thing you could say
and you have checked with Sapolsky?
Americans have got to one of the most brainwashed nations on Earth.
believing in sky fairies and boogie man devils. Worst of all most of them
still vote when both Democrats and Republicans are one big government that
have been working together in screwing the people. In any case things will
continue to decline.
Science is always improving i.e. the theory of gravity explains the facts
but it is still not complete . Concepts and hypothesis can be fine tuned .
This is one off the reasons why science is so good as it does not stick to
a bias or dogma based on assumptions rather than empirical evidence .
That’s one point of view…
He is the devil.
Robert Sapolsky is brilliant and insightful, as usual.
EDIT: Here is Part 2: http://goo.gl/nn2nE
Professor Sapolsky Explains the Origin of Religion
The brain on religion.
Talk about being on top of your material.
Interessante Vorlesung zum Ursprung von Religion.
Professor Sapolsky Explains the Origin of Religion Part 1/2
Professor Sapolsky Explains the Origin of Religion Part 2/2
21 people are catholicks…
At least it apears to be the same kind of class room…
What a dumbass, you talk like you’re smart, and might be, but you can’t
prove Unicorns aren’t real, no-one can, and anyone that thinks otherwise is
If you love talking about the Bible and church fathers so much, please
don’t involve me in your crusade. I am talking about the man in the video,
not about your Christ.
@Enginmaster To you, color and sound have meaning because of your
subjective experience of various perceptions, some of which you label
“colors” and others which you label “sounds.” However, the label “sound” is
linguistic. A dog might hear a vibration that you call “ultra-sonic” as in
beyond sound or not sound, yet in fact the vibration is merely beyond your
hearing. To label a vibration “sound” is a way of relating to it. Labeling
is distinct from perceiving, which is independent of labels.
@Enginmaster You say you are laughing. Why? Is it from joy? Is it from
stress? Is it from anxiety (fear)? Is it from pride that covers shame? You
are afraid of your anger, which is fine, but that repression will yoru
relationships and bring you to having the free time and interest to have
this exchange with me. You are fishing for compliments and validation and
doing it by casting insults and arguing. I compliment you for your
persistence and your interest, but not for competence or maturity.
Irrational? Hum, we will believe your god is real the very minute you prove
Allah isn’t real. Go ahead, make our day.
What University allowed this kind of class?
@Enginmaster Well, you are the expert here on mental ill will, sir, so I
will leave that subject to you. However, on another subject, you apparently
have not been paying attention to the scoreboard which I have right over
there (can’t you see it?) which clearly shows that I have 43 valid points
while your total score so far is “negative 0.” Your performance so far has
been so pathetic that I wonder if you have even read the rules. By the way,
your religion is antagonism, which I am against. 😉
Yes the doctrine of heaven and hell. They are paying the very church that
tells them that their brother is going to hell and they still bow in
acceptance it without any issues at all. They’ve turned my sisters into
someone who is ok with watching their own blood burn for eternity. (whether
it’s true or not) How I’m I supposed to be nice to them? Sorry, it’s
insanity, pure and simple. But again, I just have to let go and let bygones
be bygones. I’ll take a “Fukeitoll” and forget it.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
MA Home |
About MikeAdkins.com |
Contact Mike |
Search MA |
Shop Our Store |